<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ReadyState4</title>
	<link>http://readystate4.com</link>
	<description>JavaScript, Web Development, Ruby, and Technology.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Mozilla&#8217;s &#8220;home&#8221; JavaScript function by Mauvis</title>
		<link>http://readystate4.com/2008/06/30/mozillas-home-javascript-function/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Mauvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 01:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://readystate4.com/2008/06/30/mozillas-home-javascript-function/#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Yes, you're totally right Bryan. This would have been the perfect moment to preach about namespacing your JavaScript!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you&#8217;re totally right Bryan. This would have been the perfect moment to preach about namespacing your JavaScript!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mozilla&#8217;s &#8220;home&#8221; JavaScript function by Bryan Migliorisi</title>
		<link>http://readystate4.com/2008/06/30/mozillas-home-javascript-function/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Migliorisi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 03:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://readystate4.com/2008/06/30/mozillas-home-javascript-function/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Just another reason why people should namespace their JS.  Additionally, back() and forward() are also present in FF.  

Nice catch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just another reason why people should namespace their JS.  Additionally, back() and forward() are also present in FF.  </p>
<p>Nice catch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dynamically creating an iframe in Internet Explorer for remote form submissions by admin</title>
		<link>http://readystate4.com/2008/05/13/dynamically-creating-an-iframe-for-internet-explorer/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://readystate4.com/2008/05/13/dynamically-creating-an-iframe-for-internet-explorer/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Max, thanks for dropping the knowledge on me. I've clarified my post a bit to specify I'm only talking about if you want to target a dynamically generated iframe - but regardless, I've verified that your method works, too, and I like it better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max, thanks for dropping the knowledge on me. I&#8217;ve clarified my post a bit to specify I&#8217;m only talking about if you want to target a dynamically generated iframe - but regardless, I&#8217;ve verified that your method works, too, and I like it better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dynamically creating an iframe in Internet Explorer for remote form submissions by Max</title>
		<link>http://readystate4.com/2008/05/13/dynamically-creating-an-iframe-for-internet-explorer/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://readystate4.com/2008/05/13/dynamically-creating-an-iframe-for-internet-explorer/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>This is not true. You most certainly can create an iframe in IE using .createElement('iframe');

I know because I have apps that do this 2-3 times per page.

The tricks are:

1.) If you want to set the border to none, you need to set the "frameBorder" attribute to "0" (yes, camel case is required for IE)

2.) If you want to target this frame, from within the regular page, you need to set the "name" attribute.... BUT you can't do this in IE with .setAttribute('name','myIframe');
Bug 235:
http://webbugtrack.blogspot.com/2007/10/bug-235-createelement-is-broken-in-ie.html

What you will need to do is create it (for IE only) like this...

document.createElement('');
//in case this post gets mangled, replace the
//sqare brackets in the following line with angled brackets.
document.createElement('[iframe name="myIframe"]');

yes, it looks goofy and breaks spec, but this is IE.

For more info on what attributes you can and can't set in IE using .setAttribute() see this bug (242)
http://webbugtrack.blogspot.com/2007/08/bug-242-setattribute-doesnt-always-work.html

Best of luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not true. You most certainly can create an iframe in IE using .createElement(&#8217;iframe&#8217;);</p>
<p>I know because I have apps that do this 2-3 times per page.</p>
<p>The tricks are:</p>
<p>1.) If you want to set the border to none, you need to set the &#8220;frameBorder&#8221; attribute to &#8220;0&#8243; (yes, camel case is required for IE)</p>
<p>2.) If you want to target this frame, from within the regular page, you need to set the &#8220;name&#8221; attribute&#8230;. BUT you can&#8217;t do this in IE with .setAttribute(&#8217;name&#8217;,'myIframe&#8217;);<br />
Bug 235:<br />
<a href="http://webbugtrack.blogspot.com/2007/10/bug-235-createelement-is-broken-in-ie.html" rel="nofollow">http://webbugtrack.blogspot.com/2007/10/bug-235-createelement-is-broken-in-ie.html</a></p>
<p>What you will need to do is create it (for IE only) like this&#8230;</p>
<p>document.createElement(&#8221;);<br />
//in case this post gets mangled, replace the<br />
//sqare brackets in the following line with angled brackets.<br />
document.createElement(&#8217;[iframe name=&#8221;myIframe&#8221;]&#8217;);</p>
<p>yes, it looks goofy and breaks spec, but this is IE.</p>
<p>For more info on what attributes you can and can&#8217;t set in IE using .setAttribute() see this bug (242)<br />
<a href="http://webbugtrack.blogspot.com/2007/08/bug-242-setattribute-doesnt-always-work.html" rel="nofollow">http://webbugtrack.blogspot.com/2007/08/bug-242-setattribute-doesnt-always-work.html</a></p>
<p>Best of luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cookie tab for Firebug by admin</title>
		<link>http://readystate4.com/2008/03/06/cookie-tab-for-firebug/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://readystate4.com/2008/03/06/cookie-tab-for-firebug/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Thanks Juan - being able to toggle it in console options would be great - then I wouldn't even need to access the Cookies tab unless i'm searching for a particular cookie. I'll update this entry.

Additionally, thanks for taking the time to make the "extending Firebug" writeup!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Juan - being able to toggle it in console options would be great - then I wouldn&#8217;t even need to access the Cookies tab unless i&#8217;m searching for a particular cookie. I&#8217;ll update this entry.</p>
<p>Additionally, thanks for taking the time to make the &#8220;extending Firebug&#8221; writeup!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cookie tab for Firebug by Honza</title>
		<link>http://readystate4.com/2008/03/06/cookie-tab-for-firebug/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Honza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://readystate4.com/2008/03/06/cookie-tab-for-firebug/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>&#62; but perhaps an extra option for turning that off would be nice.

There is an option in the "Cookies" panel "Show logs in console" (see Options menu), which is designed just for this.

It would be probably more logical to have this option within the Console Options menu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; but perhaps an extra option for turning that off would be nice.</p>
<p>There is an option in the &#8220;Cookies&#8221; panel &#8220;Show logs in console&#8221; (see Options menu), which is designed just for this.</p>
<p>It would be probably more logical to have this option within the Console Options menu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Division of most popular social networks by country by Chris</title>
		<link>http://readystate4.com/2008/02/29/division-of-most-popular-social-networks-per-country/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://readystate4.com/2008/02/29/division-of-most-popular-social-networks-per-country/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Great find. I believe the popularity of a social networking app in a specific geography may be a result of how closely it's UIs map to the local culture's social interactions. I've blogged about it here: http://cycloneranger.com/node/105

It's all speculative, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great find. I believe the popularity of a social networking app in a specific geography may be a result of how closely it&#8217;s UIs map to the local culture&#8217;s social interactions. I&#8217;ve blogged about it here: <a href="http://cycloneranger.com/node/105" rel="nofollow">http://cycloneranger.com/node/105</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s all speculative, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
